Receive our blog posts in your email by filling out the form at the bottom of this page.
The most ardent and noisy opponents of Creeds have been those who held corrupt opinions…and…the most consistent and zealous advocates of truth have been, every where and at all times, distinguished by their friendship to such formularies. — Samuel Miller, The Utility and Importance of Creeds and Confessions ([1824], pp. 30-31; [2024], p. 22)
As the 1824 summer session began at Princeton Theological Seminary, Samuel Miller delivered a memorable lecture on The Utility and Importance of Creeds and Confessions. That lecture took place 200 years ago on July 2, 1824. There have been notable reprints of this work in 1833 and 1989. Now, in 2024, believing that Miller’s teaching on this matter is in fact relevant more than ever, Log College Press has issued a new edition of this valuable work.
In both our day and in Miller’s there are and were those who argue against the use of ecclesiastical creeds and confessions out of fear that they were supersede Scripture or impose the opinions of men on the consciences of others. To such, Miller addresses those concerns as well as others, and shows that Scripture itself mandates appropriate tests of orthodoxy.
An inspired apostle directed them not to be contented with a general profession of belief in the religion of Christ on the part of those who came to them as Christian teachers; but to examine and try them, and to ascertain whether their teaching were agreeable to the “form of sound words” which they had been taught by him: and he adds with awful solemnity — “If any man bring any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be ACCURSED". Here was, in effect, an instance, and that by Divine warrant, of employing a CREED as a test of orthodoxy: that is, men making a general profession of Christianity, are expressly directed by an inspired apostle, to be BROUGHT TO THE TEST, in WHAT SENSE THEY UNDERSTOOD THE GOSPEL, of which in general terms, they declared their reception; and how they explained its leading doctrines ([1824], pp. 25-26; [2024], pp. 18-19).
But shouldn’t Protestants embrace the position of “No creed but Christ,” and doesn’t this idea carry weight against those who believe that a church ought to have a confession of faith? Does a high view of confessional subscription mean that a document of human composition outweighs the authority of Scripture? Do confessional churches elevate the word of man above the word of God? If we accept that confessions may articulate the principal things taught by Scripture that we are to believe, what is the extent to which fundamental doctrines ought to be addressed by said confessions? Miller treats of these and other relevant questions that may be raised in this lecture from 200 years ago. The same concerns and objections that he addressed back then recur today, and his wisdom navigates a careful, Scriptural path through the errors that abound in this matter on all sides.
The 2024 Log College Press edition contains a preface by Jonathan Master, President of Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary; a foreword by Allan Stanton; and two appendices, including a letter by Joseph Bellamy, and Samuel Miller’s Introductory Essay to John Holmes Agnew, A Manual on the Christian Sabbath. Those who take up and read this special volume will find that the Biblical principle of confessional integrity is upheld in a manner that has stood the test of time.
Be forewarned: Miller’s passion for ministers and Christians who care about unity in the truth is contagious. His words are both sound and inspiring. His logic is Biblical and consistent. His message is as important today as it was two centuries ago. As Dr. Carl Trueman said about this edition, “this little work by Samuel Miller will repay careful reflection by church officers and laypeople alike.”
